The concept of Dao in the three classical interpretations of the <em>Laozi</em>: An analysis and a comparison
PDF (Español)
XML (Español)

Keywords

Laozi
Dao
Heshang gong
Xiang Er
Wang Bi

How to Cite

Costantini, Filippo. 2019. “The Concept of Dao in the Three Classical Interpretations of the <em>Laozi< Em>: An Analysis and a Comparison”. Estudios De Asia Y África 54 (3):533-60. https://doi.org/10.24201/eaa.v54i3.2533.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1429
  • PDF (Español)
    619
  • XML (Español)
    359

Metrics

Abstract

The essay analyzes and compares the concept of Dao in the three most influential commentaries of the Laozi. In particular, it explores how different readings of Dao within the texts relate to different historical periods, traditions, goals, and authors of the commentaries. For example, the tradition of the Huang-Lao school, with its interest in cosmological theories and self-cultivation, permeates the Heshang gong commentary and its vision of Dao as an accessible and knowable cosmic principle. On the other hand, in the Xiang Er, the religious institution of the Celestial Masters, approaches the Laozi as a sacred text, and Dao as a divinity with its clear and intelligible precepts. Finally, the relative interpretative freedom of Wang Bi, devoid of orthodox exegetical influences, together with the search for internal coherence of the text, generates a totally different commentary from the earlier exegetical tradition. The Laozi becomes a manual of wisdom that reveals the Dao as the logical foundation of the world.
https://doi.org/10.24201/eaa.v54i3.2533
PDF (Español)
XML (Español)

References

Ames, R. T. (1994). The art of rulership: A study of ancient Chinese political thought. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Bokenkamp, S. R. y Nickerson, P. S. (1997). Early Daoist scriptures. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Boltz, W. G. (1982). The religious and philosophical significance of the ‘Hsiang erh’ Lao tzu 相爾老子 in the light of the Ma-wang-tui silk manuscripts. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 45(1), 95-117. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00054380

Chan, A. K. L. (1991). Two visions of the way: A study of the Wang Pi and the Ho-shang Kung commentaries on the Lao-tzu. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Chang, E. Y. T. (2001). The aesthetics of Wu: Wang Bi’s ontological paradigm and the transformation of Chinese aesthetics (Disertación de doctorado). University of California, San Diego.

Henricks, R. (Trad.). (1989). Lao-Tzu Te-Tao Ching: A new translation based on the recently discovered Ma-wang-tui texts. Nueva York, NY: Ballantine Books.

Lin, P. J. (Trad.). (1977). A translation of Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching and Wang Pi’s Commentary. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.

Liu Q. 刘清章. (2015). Heshang gong zhangju pingzhu 河上公章句评注 [Anotaciones sobre el comentario de Heshang gong]. Beijing: Zongjiao wenhua chubanshe.

Lynn, R. J. (2015). Wang Bi and Xuanxue. En X. Liu (Ed.), Dao companion to Daoist philosophy (Vol. 6, pp. 369-395). Dordrecht: Springer. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2927-0_16

Michael, T. (2015). In the shadows of the Dao: Laozi, the sage, and the Daodejing. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Puett, M. (2004). Forming spirits for the way: The cosmology of the Xiang’er commentary to the Laozi. Journal of Chinese Religions, 32(1), 1-27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1179/073776904804760020

Rao Z. 饒宗頤. (2015). Laozi Xiang Er xiaozheng 老子想爾校証 [Recopilación del comentario Xiang Er del Laozi]. Shanghái: Zhonghua Shuju.

Robinet, I. (1981). Historie du taoïsme. Des origines au XIVE siècle. París: Cerf.

Robinet, I. (1998). Later commentaries: Textual polysemy and syncretistic interpretations. En L. Kohn y M. LaFargue (Eds.), Lao-Tzu and the Tao-Te-Ching (pp. 119-142). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Tadd, M. A. (2002). Alternatives to monism and dualism: Seeking yang substance with yin mode in Heshanggong’s commentary on the Daodejing (Disertación de doctorado). Universidad de Boston, Massachusetts.

Wagner, R. G. (1986). Wang Bi: “The structure of the Laozi’s pointers” (Laozi weizhi lilüe). T’oung Pao, 72(1), 92-129. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853286X00114

Wagner, R. G. (2000). The craft of a Chinese commentator: Wang Bi on the Laozi. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Wagner, R. G. (2003a). Language, ontology, and political philosophy in China: Wang Bi’s scholarly exploration of the dark (Xuanxue). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Wagner, R. G. (2003b). A Chinese reading of the Daodejing: Wang Bi’s Commentary on the Laozi with critical text and translation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Licencia de Creative Commons

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Copyright 2022 Estudios de Asia y África