Keywords
onomatopoeia
iconicity
Korean
mimetic words
How to Cite
-
Abstract499
-
PDF (Español)393
-
HTML (Español)11
Abstract
Ideophones and onomatopoeia have received surprisingly little attention in Romance languages, including Spanish. They have been misunderstood and marginalized as peripheral, immature, unnecessary and less-linguistic words, deprived of the significant, scholarly attention that they deserve. Recently, due to the success of mangas and webtoons, the number of studies related to onomatopoeia have increased. However, studies in Spanish related to Korean ideophones and onomatopoeia remain limited. This research, focused on Korean ideophones, aims to demonstrate the relevance of these words in Korean, a clearly phonosymbolic language. To do this, the linguistic characteristics of Korean ideophones are explained, followed by the analysis of a short text, written by the contemporary writer Park Min-Gyu, formed by eleven ideophones and two examples of onomatopoeia.
References
Akita, Kimi. 2009. “A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Japanese Mimetics”. Tesis de doctorado. Kobe University. http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/repository/thesis/d1/D1004724.pdf
Akita, Kimi y Mark Dingemanse. 2019. “Ideophones (Mimetics, Expressives)”. En Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, editado por M. Aronoff. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.477
Akita, Kimi y Prashant Pardeshi, eds. 2019. Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16
Arias-Cachero Cabal, Álvaro. 2005.“La armonización vocálica en fonología funcional (de lo sintagmático en fonología a propósito de dos casos de metafonía hispánica”. Moenia: Revista Lucense de Lingüística y Literatura, núm. 11: 111-139. http://hdl.handle.net/10347/5730
Aston, W. G. 1894. “Japanese Onomatopes and the Origin of Language”. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 23: 332-362. https://doi.org/10.2307/2842085
Bahón Arnaiz, Cristina. 2019. “Ideófonos en coreano: aspectos lingüísticos y literarios”. Tesis de doctorado. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. http://hdl.handle.net/10486/690282
Casas-Tost, Helena. 2008. “Estudio comparativo de las onomatopeyas chinas y españolas”. En Nuevas perspectivas de investigación sobre Asia Pacífico, coordinado por Pedro San Ginés Aguilar, 339-353. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
Chewan. 1987. “Gugeo eumseong sangjingnonui myeon munje” 국어 음성상징론의 몇 문제 [Algunos problemas del fonosimbolismo coreano]. Gugeohak 국어학16. https://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=184721
Chewan. 1993. “Uiseongeo-uitaeeoui tongsawa uimi” 의성어-의태 어의 통사와 의미 [Características sintácticas y semánticas de los ideófonos coreanos]. Saegugeosaenghwal 새국어생활 3 (2): 54-72. https://www.korean.go.kr/nkview/nklife/1993_2/3_3.html
Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. “Notes on Expressive Meaning”. En Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, editado por Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi y Gloria C. Phares, 440-447. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. “Advances in the Cross-Linguistic Study of Ideophones”. Language and Linguistics Compass 6 (10): 654-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.361
Dingemanse, Mark. 2015. “Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (10): 603-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
Dingemanse, Mark. 2019. "‘Ideophone’ as a Comparative Concept”. En Ideophones, Mimetics, and Expressives, editado por Kimi Akita y Prashant Pardeshi, 13-33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16.02din
Doke, Clement M. 1935. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. Londres: Longmans, Green, and Co.
García Yebra, Valentín. 1982. Teoría y práctica de la traducción. Madrid: Gredos.
Gasca, Luis y Román Gubern. 2008. Diccionario de onomatopeyas del cómic. Madrid: Cátedra.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2006. “Estudio lexicológico de las onomatopeyas vascas: el Euskal Onomatopeien Hiztegia: Euskara- Ingelesera-Gaztelania”. Fontes Linguae Vasconum 101 (38): 147- 162. https://binadi.navarra.es/registro/00007105
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2017. “Basque Ideophones from a Typological Perspective”. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62 (2): 196-220. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.8
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2020. “Ideófonos y poesía”. Tropelías. Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada, núm. 7: 411-425. https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/tropelias/article/view/4792
Inose, Hiroko. 2009. “La traducción de onomatopeyas y mímesis japonesas”. Sendebar: Revista de la Facultad de Traducción e Interpretación, núm. 20: 31-47. http://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/sendebar/article/view/390
Kilian-Hatz, Christa. 2001. “Universality and Diversity: Ideophones from Baka and Kxoe”. En Ideophones, editado por F. K. Erhard Voeltz y Christa Kilian-Hatz, 155-163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44.13kil
Kim, Do-Hun. 2014. “Han-yeong uiseongeo-uitaeeo bigyo mit beonyeong gibeop” 한-영 의성어·의태어 비교 및 번역 기법 [Comparación entre la onomatopeya coreana-inglesa y la traducción de la onomatopeya coreana al inglés]. Hangukbeonyeokhakoe 한국번역학회 15 (1): 25-50. https://doi.org/10.15749/jts.2014.15.1.002 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti_id=ART001862798
Kim, Hong-Beom. 1995. “Hangugeo sangjingeoui tongsa-uimironjeong yeongu” 한국어 상징어의 통사․의미론적 연구) [Características sintácticas y semánticas de las mímesis coreanas]. Aesanhakbo 애산학보 17. https://www.earticle.net/Journal/Issues/441/4787
Kim, Hye-Jeoung. 2011. Coreano para principiantes. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
Kim, In-Hwa. 1995. “Hyeondae hangugeoui eumseongsangjingeo yeongu” 현대 한국어의 음성상징어 연구 [Estudio de las mímesis coreanas contemporáneas]. Tesis de doctorado. Ewha Womans University. https://academic.naver.com/article.naver?doc_id=11609579
Kwon, Insook. 2014. “It all Leads to Education: Korean Motherhood, Patriarchy, and Class Consciousness in the TV Drama, Eligible Wife (Anaeui Jagyeok)”. The Review of Korean Studies 17 (1): 39-70. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001883215
Lee, Sang-Gyoo. 1993. “Gugeoui uiseong-uitaeeo yeongu” 국어 의 의성 의태어 연구 [Estudio de los ideófonos y las onomatopeyas coreanas]. Tesis de maestría. Universidad Hanyang. https://lib.aks.ac.kr/search/DetailView.ax?cid=19170
Müller, Max. 1861. Lectures on the Science of Language: Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in April, May, and June 1861. Londres: Longman, Green, Longman, y Roberts. https://doi.org/10.1037/14263-000
Noss, Philip A. 2001. “Ideas, Phones, and Gbaya Verbal Art”. En Ideophones, editado por F. K. Erhard Voeltz y Christa Kilian-Hatz, 259-270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44.21nos
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1999. “The Case for Sound Symbolism”. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 225-252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.225
Nuckolls, Janis B. 2001. “Ideophones in Pastaza Quechua”. En Ideophones, editado por F. K. Erhard Voeltz y Christa Kilian- Hatz, 271-285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44.22nuc
Nuckolls, Janis B. 2006. “The Neglected Poetics of Ideophony”. En Language, Culture and the Individual: A Tribute to Paul Friedrich, editado por Catherine O’Neil, Mary Scoggin y Kevin Tuite, 39-50. Múnich: Lincom Europa.
Park, Dong-Geun. 1996. “Hyeondaegugeo hyungnaemarui yeongu” 현대국어 흉내말의 연구 [Un estudio de las palabras simbólicas en coreano moderno]. Tesis de doctorado. Konkuk University. https://academic.naver.com/article.naver?doc_id=11620313
Park, Dong-Geun. 2008. “Hangugeo hyungnaemarui ihae” 한국어 흉내말의 이해 [Comprensión de las mímesis coreanas]. Seúl: Yeongnak.
Park, Dong-Geun. 2016. “Hangugeo uiseongeowa uitaeeoui hyeongtae bigyo” 한국어 의성어와 의태어의 형태 비교 [Una comparación morfológica entre palabras onomatopéyicas e imitativas del coreano]. Hanmaryeonguhakoe 한말연구학회 Korean Language Research, núm. 42, 61-82. https://doi.org/10.16876/klrc.2016.42.61
Park, Min-Gyu. 2012. Kaseutera 카스테라 [Bizcocho]. Seúl: Munhakdongne.
Schourup, Lawrence. 1993. “Nichi-Ei Onomatope no Taisho: Ken- Kyu” [Un estudio contrastivo de la onomatopeya japonesa e inglesa]. Gengo 22 (6): 48-55.
Urtel, Herman. 1919. “Zur baskischen Onomatopoesis”. Berlin: n.d.
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard y Christa Kilian-Hatz, eds. 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44
Wojciechowski, Bartosz T. 2013. “Japanese Ideophones: Towards a Systematic Phono-Semantic Description”. Silva Iaponicarum, núm. 35-36, 27-45.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Copyright 2022 Estudios de Asia y África